|
|
Post by Jim1025 on Sept 22, 2007 9:04:47 GMT -5
Which Hulk Hogan movie do you think was better?
|
|
|
|
Post by defdave on Sept 23, 2007 0:59:18 GMT -5
I never saw Suburban Commando. I never saw it back then because I wasn't really interested in it, tbh. Back then I remember not wanting to see it because it had nothing to do with wrestling. The same was true for Mr. Nanny or whatever it was called. Haven't seen either of them, even though I've always been a big Hogan fan. I'm sure I'll rent them eventually though, just to check them out.
No Holds Barred on the other hand I loved. I went to the theater in 1989 and watched it when it debuted, and I absolutely loved every second of it and still do.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bill Hart on Sept 26, 2007 9:23:27 GMT -5
If your a classic Hogan fan you should see Suburban Commando. Its a better produced movie, better story, better acting. No Holds Barred is a good movie for wrestling fans, but anyone can enjoy Suburban Commando.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jim1025 on Sept 30, 2007 12:18:55 GMT -5
I'm split between the two. I think they're both good. dave, you really need to see Suburban Commando. Its the classic Hogan at his best, plus he takes on The Undertaker. I watched this again yesterday. Its a movie I'll never get tired of.
|
|
|
|
Post by defdave on Sept 30, 2007 12:28:27 GMT -5
hmmm...sounds cool. I'll have to rent it, then.
|
|
|
|
Post by defdave on Dec 11, 2010 21:51:32 GMT -5
Never got around to renting it but I still would love to see it. Been so busy the past few years. I hardly get time to watch any movie at all.
|
|
